EZ Texting Vs. Text Request

See how EZ Texting compares to Text Request in terms of features and more.

Book a Demo

How does EZ Texting compare to Text Request?

EZ Texting Full LogoEZ Texting Icon Logo
text-request-logotext-request-logo-small

Usage

*Last updated on 30 August 2024

Pros and Cons of EZ Texting

Pros

  • Established SMS marketing service with a focus on text messaging
  • Offers a "Start for Free" option with fast registration

Cons

  • Limited communication channels: Primarily focuses on SMS, while Whippy offers a more comprehensive omni-channel approach including SMS, email, and other messaging channels
  • Less advanced automation: EZ Texting's automation capabilities are more basic compared to Whippy's complex, multi-step Workflow Automations
  • Narrower integration ecosystem: While EZ Texting offers some integrations, Whippy provides a more extensive range of integrations with CRMs, ATSs, and industry-specific software
  • Potentially less flexible for diverse business needs: EZ Texting is more focused on SMS marketing, while Whippy offers a broader range of communication tools

Pros and Cons of Text Request

Pros

  • TextRequest is established in the SMS space and has been around for many years.
  • TextRequest is great for small teams who need manual 1-1 messaging and a payments integration.

Cons

  • Message organization issues. It can be difficult to fully close or archive messages that are no longer relevant.
  • Notification issues. Occasionally, message notifications can get lost or overlooked.
  • Poor mobile functionality. Some users report difficulty composing new messages to current clients on mobile devices

Frequently Asked Questions

EZ Texting Vs...

Select to see how EZ Texting compares to other services

Want to automate your communication?

Book a demo and see how easy it is to integrate Whippy with your existing systems.