Text Request Vs. EZ Texting

See how Text Request compares to EZ Texting in terms of features and more.

Book a Demo

How does Text Request compare to EZ Texting?

text-request-logotext-request-logo-small
EZ Texting Full LogoEZ Texting Icon Logo

*Last updated on 29 August 2024

Pros and Cons of Text Request

Pros

  • TextRequest is established in the SMS space and has been around for many years.
  • TextRequest is great for small teams who need manual 1-1 messaging and a payments integration.

Cons

  • Message organization issues. It can be difficult to fully close or archive messages that are no longer relevant.
  • Notification issues. Occasionally, message notifications can get lost or overlooked.
  • Poor mobile functionality. Some users report difficulty composing new messages to current clients on mobile devices

Pros and Cons of EZ Texting

Pros

  • Established SMS marketing service with a focus on text messaging
  • Offers a "Start for Free" option with fast registration

Cons

  • Limited communication channels: Primarily focuses on SMS, while Whippy offers a more comprehensive omni-channel approach including SMS, email, and other messaging channels
  • Less advanced automation: EZ Texting's automation capabilities are more basic compared to Whippy's complex, multi-step Workflow Automations
  • Narrower integration ecosystem: While EZ Texting offers some integrations, Whippy provides a more extensive range of integrations with CRMs, ATSs, and industry-specific software
  • Potentially less flexible for diverse business needs: EZ Texting is more focused on SMS marketing, while Whippy offers a broader range of communication tools

Frequently Asked Questions

Text Request Vs...

Select to see how Text Request compares to other services

Want to automate your communication?

Book a demo and see how easy it is to integrate Whippy with your existing systems.